We had another engaging and informative discussion with
Richard Batenburg (CEO of Batmann Analytics) on “The
Leader’s Edge” last week. One of the topics that came up was the idea that,
when you have a high level of trust in an organization, people will feel
comfortable expressing their opinion, even when that opinion and the ensuing
discussion could lead to conflict. We also talked about the fact that, while
conflict can be uncomfortable for many people, “healthy” conflict breeds
creativity and innovation and is important to an organization’s success.
This discussion reminded me of an article that Dave and I
wrote a couple of years ago and I thought it was appropriate to share it again
here:
You might want to sit down for this
one. It could be a little painful.
Think back to your last staff
meeting. (We warned you this could be painful.) Either the staff meeting that
you sat in with your boss or the one you held with your own team.
What was the highlight of that
meeting?
1. The
donuts or other foodstuffs
2. A
recap of the NFL playoffs
3. The
big news about celebrity breakups
4. Rumors
about layoffs or cost cutting measures
5. The
rousing discussion surrounding a decision that needed to be made
We’ll bet it’s one of the first 4,
because if your meetings are typical of most staff meetings, number 5 never
happened. In fact, number 5 rarely happens at any level of an organization
inside or outside of staff meetings.
For the last several years
businesses across the globe have struggled with a number of factors including
slowing economies, the high cost of labor, the realignment of the internet and
the presence on the World Wide Web. Moving down a few levels in the
organization, managers and leaders have struggled with productivity and process
issues, turnover of key employees, morale problems; the list goes on.
With all of these issues to face,
why do so few organizations engage in loud, long, healthy debate on issues that
are critical to the success of the business? Managers and leaders sit in
meetings and report the status of their projects, trying to call as little
attention to themselves as possible. Or, they sit at the head of the table like
the high priest and make pronouncements about the direction of the business
like they have all of the answers at their fingertips.
At some point in time, businesses
seemed to decide that harmony is the key to success. People were encouraged to
be “team players” and to “get along” with others around them in a
well-intentioned, but wrong-headed attempt to streamline the decision process.
Instead of actively debating issues
that come up, we all try to find “common ground” and “compromise” in an attempt
to please everyone around us.
What happens when we cut off
discussion and debate to promote harmony?
For one thing, we drive the real
decision-making process underground. How many times have you sat in a meeting
and listened as everyone seemed to agree on a plan of action, only to find out
later that no one took the actions that they agreed to. In reality, they didn’t
believe in the agreement and therefore felt no compulsion to keep their
commitments. Often, a lack of debate also represents a lack of buy-in from
those present. Rather than fight the issue publicly, those not in agreement
express their discontent through a passive aggressive process that causes the
idea to never be implemented.
An active, lively debate on a topic
allows for multiple opinions to be aired and for ideas to be developed and
improved upon. As a leader you should encourage your team’s input and thoughts.
Concerns should be expressed; solutions bandied about; and honest debate should
be required.
All of this is not to imply that we
are encouraging members of the team to sit around and argue without cause. But
team members should feel open to express whatever real issues, thoughts, and
concerns they have. And that active debate, the role of honest conflict in the
workplace, separates good teams from great teams.
Until next time….
Laurie Valaer
ECI Learning Systems, LLC
http://www.ECILearning.com
Laurie,
ReplyDeleteThanks for the post. This can endemic. I am fortunate with my new firm that this "open" dialog and behavior is encouraged. I have worked where it is not. I have also worked where it was just expected to argue.
We are supposedly looking for passionate and engaged personnel, we should expect nothing but their best thinking, even if it is different than our own.
Best wishes,
John